Major differences between the two theories Essay

The obviously notable difference surrounded by Banduras societal cognitive conjecture and Becks cognitive scheme is the bias that each(prenominal) has towards demeanour. For instance, Banduras amaze is much behavioral, whereas Becks model is inclined towards psychotherapeutics or seems to provide psychological solutions to problems. The social cognitive theory (by Bandura) is presented in an agentic perspective. It explains why people exhibit differences in self-organization, being proactive, participation in self-reflection, and in self-regulation (Bandura, 1986).In essence, the theory does not just show that humankind beings have different capabilities, it also shows that other factors such as the purlieu play a major role in shaping behaviourism (Bandura, 1986). The theory further describes human beings as producers as well as products of what they make (the proverb manners maketh man should be true). Banduras theory also gives the socio cognitive aspects of human bein gs, for example, why they act in special(a) manners and what elicits such behavior.Additionally, the theory also gives reasons why the human temperament is vast in terms of capabilities and how humanity is fashioned by contain and observational experience that is integrated in a variety of forms. In contradistinction, Becks theory gives a picture of the phenomena underlying dysfunctional beliefs (Beck, 1976). This theory does not just describe personality, but provides solutions to psychological problems. This is achieved by the models blow-by-blow analysis of the casual agents of depression and how depression enkindle be remedied (Beck, 1976).Becks theory seems to give mediation approach in solve psychological problems by encouraging patients to be participants of the problem solving process rather than passive and helpless respondents. Another difference between the cardinal theories is the triad used in each of the theories, which forms the basis of the inherent exercises and discussions. Banduras model is a triad with behavior, environmental factors and personal determinants as the main elements. On the other hand, Becks cognitive model consists of behavior, source events and consequences (Beck, 1976 Beck, 1998).The triads may seem to portray a similarity between the two models but in real sense they exhibit differences since the explanation of how the elements in the triads profess each other or act on their protest is slightly different. For instance, in Banduras theory, the description of how the factors in the triad affect each other revolves around cause and effect. One of the factors, such as the environment is implied to be a cause (or a factor that determines) of behavior. Thus, on that point is emphasis on reciprocal determinism.On the other hand, Becks triadic illustration of the factors that shape personality and character is influenced by the person (self), the world and the future. In this context, it is evident that personality is affected not just by behavior but also by other events that occur in life. In fact, Beck (1976) describes the person (self) as the main source of ideas to solve depression problems with persona to the world and anticipation of a better future. Conclusion Banduras cognitive Theory and Becks cognitive Theory seem to have more similarities in that they describe personality and the factors shape it.Many elements described in each theorys triad show convergence in meaning. Major differences between the two models lie in the description of the models. bit Banduras model is inclined towards behaviorism, Becks model provides an explanation of psychological dysfunctions and possible remedies.References Bandura A. (2006). Psychological modeling Conflicting theories. Chicago Aldine Transaction. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy The exercise of control. impudent York W. H. Freeman Company Bandura, A. (1986).Social foundations of thoughts and action A social cognitive theory. in the altoget her Jersey Prentice Hall Professional Technical.Bandura, A. (1976) Social learning theory. saucy York Prentice Hall Bandura, A. (1971). Psychological modeling Conflicting theories. Chicago Aldine- Atherton. Beck, A. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. New York Guilford Press Beck, A. (1976). Cognitive therapy & emotional disorders. NY International Universities Press. Beck, A. (1998). The integrated Power of Cognitive Therapy. New York Guilford Press.