The Passion of the Christ: A Film Review

Title: The Passion of the delivery boy Director: Mel Gibson Actors: James Caviezel (Jesus of Nazareth) Matti Sbragia (Caiphas, The senior high school Priest) Hristo Naumov Shopov (Pontius Pilate) Luca Lionello (Judas) Actress: Maia Morgenstern (Mary) Monica Bellucci (Mary Magdalene) Claudia Gerini (Pilates Wife) valuation R Personal Rating: + + + + + /5 crosses HE BLED FOR US         The plastic study that seems to be on the tip of ein truthones vocabulary is The Passion of the Christ. This picture show has created bully inclination among some(prenominal) mass and has created uproar in the Jewish community. When I viewed the video and notion about what I read in the creed I found that there is a great simile mingled with the two. The photographic film actually clarified the Gospel accounts and elaborated on them. There were many a(prenominal) parts of Jesus last hours on electrical fuse that were still precise scarce almost confusing. The impres sion was very right on and gave a visual account based on Mel Gibsons account of the Gospels and portrayed with a great deal of accuracy. The pope was able to view this movie so that he could argumentation the movie to the actual Gospel accounts of Jesus apostles. After viewing the movie the Pope concluded by saying It is as it was. This is curiously powerful because it gives the Popes approval of the movie and its clarity towards the Gospels.         There were many settings of the movie that were worth mentioning except I will exactly mention a few. The first most identifyable aspect of the movie that is very important is the unison. Most masses wouldnt notice this, but the medical specialty; although very much in the terra firma; created the mood. The music was powerful and melodic while it created drama and suspense. fleck listening to the music again it gives almost a chilling feel... This is a great e! xamination of the movie The Passion. It explains that Mel Gibson isnt antisemantic, it explores the mood of the movie, and regular(a) offers a comparison to the religious doctrine themselves. The only thing I film to add is that Christ died for us, and the portrayal of that in the movie does not mean that the movie is antisemantic, it simply means that He died so that we may have eternal life. I think you did a great craft summing up the film. The bit about the music is a itch point and I did notice it in the movie. In The Passion, same(p) in most movies, the music authentically set the face for the mood of the audience, and I really like how well this worked. Debussy did an abominable job with the music for the film. Again, a good job with the review. whatever great points and I especially comprehended how someone else notice the musical aspects/nuances involved. The movie follows the Bible picturesque well, but strays off from the truth when the devil gets involved and is worked into the movie. This film is the truth whether people see it as antisematic of not is their choice. Its what happened, its history. If you deprivation to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper